Monday, April 16, 2018


You might have heard of the "agent provocateur," an agent whose mission is to covertly join an organization and make its members commit illegal acts in order to compromise the target organization, getting its members arrested, and sent to jail. But there is another agent, whose purpose is much broader, and in some cases encompasses and includes the Agent Provocateur.

Conflict Mongers specialize in creating conflicts. They get you and your friend to have a conflict. Joe, a conflict monger, who has worked to gain your confidence, tells your friend Bill, that you said Bill was an idiot. Then Joe comes to you and tells you that Bill made a pass at your wife. The result: You and Bill fight.

The Conflict Monger craft is not limited to personal relationships. Nations, political organizations, weapons dealers, international bankers, and media and propagandists, use Conflict Mongers to profit from the conflicts they create.

Weapons dealers incite two sides of a political equation to go to war, so that they can profit from arms sales to both sides.

International bankers can profit from such a conflict by financing both sides to go to war and then profit from the resulting "reconstruction" period after the war.

Financial and Capital manipulators will tamper with the stock market to create the rise and fall of stocks and bonds, and reap the benefit of that manipulation.

In the intelligence field, it is common to find on both sides of a political equation, Conflict Mongers working feverishly to create chaos inside the enemy camp. An organization with internal conflict is much easier to conquer or control, than one that can muster a united front against its enemies.

In an example much closer to home, you will see Conservative social network web sites, sometimes in conflict with each other. To the uninitiated it may seem that one side has attacked the other, and that the other is merely defending itself. Upon closer examination you might find, however, that a Conflict Monger has created a conflict between both sides, in order to destroy that web site or to destroy both web sites by "stoking the fires."

And one might have also experienced a web site's members in conflict amongst themselves. Again we may find a Conflict Monger agent at work.

While an "Agent Provocateur" would work to get a web site to publish copyrighted material in its blogs, post messages on the web site blogs or forums that included hate speech or threats of violence, and perhaps even go as far as to get one of its members to commit to doing something illegal, a Conflict Monger would go further and create antagonism within a group and even possibly between two or more groups with the aim of destroying the credibility of the group, or even to cause the group to cease to exist.

And there is nothing that says that the Agent Provocateur(s) and the Conflict Monger(s), might be one and the same, and is working to both, compromise the group by tricking it into doing something illegal, AND to create conflict between a web site's members and between different groups.

It is particularly difficult on the internet to know who is who, because the internet provides a degree of anonymity, and lends itself to such subterfuge. It is here that one has to remain alert to these "agents," because the internet, social networking sites, and related communications functions and devices are a major part of Conservative advancement within the last year.

After Obama succeeded in winning the 2008 election, his effort was heralded to have flourished via the internet and has been touted as a major influence in his victory. Although it might have had a significant impact, it pales in comparison to the evolution of Conservative efforts via the internet. Conservative advances via the internet have not received much attention in the National Socialist propaganda media, but without a doubt, Conservative organizational accomplishments dwarf the results of its opponents.

The combination of the internet social networking, along with Talk Radio, and the Conservative forums on Fox News has created a formula that is serving at this time, Conservative causes and purposes.

This makes Conservative efforts a major target of its opponents. Just as the White House chose to attack Fox News, during the Obama Administration, because it would not give in to the National Socialist agenda, It would be foolish not to expect infiltration and attempts at disruption of Conservative Social Networks, web sites, and blogs.

It might not be easy to spot an Agent Provocateur or a Conflict Monger, but if one is alert, one might discover such a culprit busily at work in your group by observing the following:

1. Understand the efforts and purpose of the group or web site that you join.

2. Observe the communication of its members. Which member's communication does not align to the purposes of the group?

3. Which member does not abide by the stated, published rules or policy of the group?

4. Which member is communicating negatively against other members, without just cause?

5. Which member is carrying on a "whispering campaign" about other members or the web site.  Which one is constantly advertising and recruiting for other groups?

6. One of the best ways to "show up" or expose Conflict Mongers is to create an organization or group that strictly adheres to its purpose, and promotes and advances those purposes accordingly. Anyone who deviates from the purpose can be noticed or can become obvious by being the one whose actions show that he is in conflict with the organization and its purposes. "Ye shall know them by their deeds." Sound familiar?

7. And then there is that one member that just does not understand, and is constantly asking you to explain things to them, doesn't seem to be able to get with the program, or needs to be "baby-sat." While there may be novices, who do need a certain amount of attention, how hard can it be to be a Conservative? One either is or isn't. One tells them to get with the program: Educate them with references and keep them in your radar. But be wary. That member might just have another agenda.

8. One might also know "the connections" of a member to members of the oppostion. While there might be a professional connection, to what extent does that association affect their affiliation to your group?

9. Take notes. If someone says or does things that do not align to the purposes of your group, note them down. These may show up later in another venue on another web site being promoted by someone under a different name. These notes can become a "trail of illogic" that might lead you to thwart an attempt to disrupt your activities.

10. Take responsibility for your self and your group. The success of Conservative Groups is the result of the actions of its members. It is YOU who are responsible for your group, and you can make a significant difference in its success.

11. If a conflict does arise, and/or if one is in full swing already, do not promote it or advertise it. This only feeds the conflict and detracts from your group's agenda or cause. The more you repeat information about the conflict, the more you promote or enhance it. Figure out a way to handle it quickly, resolve it, identify the Conflict Monger, and get on with your work.

It is important to know also what is a Conservative, a Liberal, a Socialist, a Libertarian, a Rino, a Moderate, a Blue Dog Democrat, and an Independent. The differences are significant.

Around the time of the 2008 election, many so-called Conservative Social Networks were created, and while these served as the basis for the eventual flourisihing of a flurry of Conservative activity on the internet, some of the original web sites advertised as being "Center-Right" sites, seeking to create a coalition of members ranging from "moderate" Republicans to Conservative stalwarts.

Since that time the differences in the various factions have become more obvious, particularly in the national political arena, and membership has shifted within and between those groups. Accordingly members of the opposition have capitalized on the differences between the groups to cause friction.

The point of this article is not to promote the "umbrella" or "big tent" idea of a broad based coalition of "center-right" groups to defeat the National Socialist Democrats. It is to alert Conservative Groups to the situation that their groups might be attacked from within as well as from outside of the group by Conflict Monger agents, seeking to cause discord with the intent of rendering their efforts ineffective.,

Principled Conservatives, who will not compromise on core issues simply for the sake of obtaining a vote in favor of a particular issue, and who refuse to make "deals with the devil" will prosper by continuing to build and further establish grass-root efforts, magnifying and expanding the causes of the Conservative Cultural Revolution, and work to point out the exact differences that will create our Renaissance of Freedom.

It is not only prudent to say, "THIS is what we stand for," and demand that those purposes be promoted, preserved and advanced.  It is necessary to our survival as a nation that we make it clear that the folly of the issues of other groups, their political correctness, their lack of a foundation of Life based on moral and ethical principles, will result in a deterioration of their cultures, as is evident today across this country and throughout the world.

It is optimum to point out our PURPOSES, which define us, and what those purposes are based on, and to use this as a flag and a rallying point. The gray area of "coalition," of political correctness, of inclusion, of compromise with our principles only results in a watered-down culture unable to survive the hard realities of dangerous and determined enemies.

While we have not yet attained Vanguards that are the epitome of perfection, we can recognize which ones will advance our Causes, and which will not, and when they do, we support them, while when they do not, we must hold them accountable.

And finally, a factor that is vital to knowledge about "The Conflict Mongers," is this:  The American culture has been invaded by a foreign, antagonistic, aggressively hostile culture. It is, what is known at Vanguard of Freedom, as the Socialist Cult of Mass Murder.  This culture has invaded our nation and now has occupied it, and has colonized it.  The SCOMM continues to advance is culture of death and to destroy the positive elements of American Culture, especially that aspect of American culture that includes it's Christian Fundamentals.  The SCOMM extracts its tribute from our nation by plundering through endless forms of taxation, under the guise of "redistribution of the wealth."  The SCOMM finances through taxes, its activities and attacks upon American culture, and uses politically Liberal persons and groups, and in fact, now dominates almost entirely all Liberal factions in this nation, and has effectively merged Liberals into the SCOMM.  Agents of the SCOMM, their adherents, commonly use the proverbial "We" to denigrate our culture:
"We are deteriorating as a nation." "We Americans have caused violence against other nations."  "We Americans enslaved Black Americans."  We Americans defeated and wiped out Native Americans."  "We are a divided nation, country, etc.
There is no "WE" in these matters.  When used by the SCOMM, they are using this as a downgrade and denigration of American Culture, and are working towards its demise, by recruiting prospective members who are weak members of American Culture.  There is an American Culture.  Its Vanguards of Freedom still hold true to its principles and its tenets. Vanguards of Freedom continue the fight against the Socialist Cult of Mass Murder, and we continue to create within our communities our Renaissance of Freedom.

When we are clear about what we stand for, clear about not compromising with our basic purposes, we will advance accordingly in our Cause. The deeds of the National Socialists have illuminated the differences between "us" and "them," and we must now trumpet those differences to the political and cultural gray areas.

Is our side the side of political cronyism, back room deals, hidden agendas, outright or covert bribery, sell-outs to the highest bidder, permissive and promiscuous cultural values, materialism, decadence, and the inability to answer attacks against our nation because we are too wishy washy to call an enemy an enemy?

The answer is NO WE ARE NOT.

We are not the Conflict Mongers, nor the Agent Provocateurs, and refuse to be the enablers of such agents of doom. What then are we?

We are the Vanguard of Freedom, the Advance of Freedom, and we aim to bring about a Renaissance of Freedom via the American Conservative Cultural Revolution.

Tuesday, January 23, 2018



First, we are told that there is a plethora of information leaks from every crevice, corner, keyboard, mouth, or phone. 

Now suddenly there is a document, a "memo," that has to go through all manner of procedural, and probably, vetting processes, so that you or I can be protected from the impact of this devastating information. 

Suddenly there are NO LEAKS. 

Everyone but you has seen it, but there are NO LEAKS. 

Get this:  Because it's "classified." 

I bet if I interviewed YOU, just from the things you know about recent "governmental" shenanigans, you could tell me exactly what's in it. 

It has been hinted that the info in that document has to do with the government spying on you; that it has to do with departments of the government that have been weaponized against you. 

So, now we are going to be surprised and shocked, and shocked and surprised at new evidence that is beyond the pale.

How much "evidence" do you need?

There's no need to repeat that Hillary violated national security with that private email server;  No need to expound upon the Democratic National Committee fixing the election; No need to elaborate about the targeting of citizens by the IRS, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA... etc. etc.

According to "news" reports and other propaganda sources, a multitude of Legislators have already seen the document.   It sounds to me like they are saying to you, "Now wait a minute.  All these wonderful, legitimate, politicians have seen this document, and they aren't running out and clamoring that anyone be hanged for their crimes, so you shouldn't either."

Here's another interesting scenario:  The "Government" is basically saying that it's going to reveal, that the American Constitutional Republic, that YOU thought you were living in, does not exist.  They are admitting it's gone.   Oops.

In the course of revealing that AMERICA is a police state, they are giving you a heads up, and gently telling you, so that you can accept it,  hopefully without too much outrage:

"Hey, Mr. and Mrs. America.  We are announcing that we are officially  a dictatorship.  There is no Republic.  No Constitution.  We're in charge.  We've taken over, and, now that we've told you, you are one of us.  We're letting you in on the secret and we're making you one of the conspirators.  Welcome to the United States of American Socialist Republics."

They are going to tell you not to worry, that everything is under control, and they have your back.

"We're on it, buddy.  You 'n me.  We got this."

Let's stretch this out to the day the "memo" is released, after you are shocked and awed into a political stupor.

What then?

What will you do? 

Here's what the political elite are counting on: 

//We're going to put on our best Sunday garb, and march in protest on Washington D.C. 

Well, we're going to watch the Superbowl first, but then we'll march.  Sort of.//

Are they right?

Or will it be different, this time?

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Ground Zero: Hawaii

After the emergency and the panic caused by the false alarm, that there was a nuclear missile on its way to Hawaii, the finger pointing and blame game began.  Whose fault was it?  Who needed to be accountable?

Naturally people were upset for all the right reasons: They thought they had but a few minutes of Life left to live.  You can imagine the panic and confusion.

It was a mistake, it turns out, an error.  Someone pushed the "wrong button."

Such incidents unfortunately have happened before.  In those cases nuclear catastrophe was imminent, and was not a "false alarm."

Usually it is kept very quiet, and the Hawaii incident is no different.  What has not been mentioned are the disastrous and catastrophic effects that I can only surmise, occurred not just in Hawaii, but in the rest of the world, as that unfortunate incident was unfolding.

Nuclear "mistakes" do not happen in a vacuum.

We are prone to believe that the nuclear warning mistake was contained to Hawaii, but that unfortunately, even if you prefer believing in Santa Claus, is not the case.  Nuclear warnings and alarms, by design, trigger potentially catastrophic responses and actions that can be devastating to the entire planet.

A perceived threat against U.S. territory or an ally,  will set in motion sets of predetermined actions that will trigger massive defensive and offensive actions by our forces internationally in response to the threat.

Additionally this also triggers massive defensive and offensive actions by our allies, and by our adversaries and enemies internationally.

A flock of geese crossed into the U.S. from Canada, for example, last century, and the NORAD early warning system "read" those geese as missiles instead of as a jet.  That radar system was programmed to exclude jets, airliners, and other planes by detecting them as "air breathers,"  with engines that pulled in air in the front and let it out the back.  It was programmed to detect "non-air breathers,"  which would be, missiles.

That system read the flock of geese as missiles, and it set off alarms immediately.  The early warning system did its job.  It warned our military, not that an attack was imminent, but that it was in progress.  It had read that missiles had been launched and they had crossed into our air space, and nuclear bombs would be exploding imminently.  Of course that was horrifying news to all who experienced the alarm.

But that was not all there was to be horrified about.

That system also triggered the U.S. response to the perceived "attack."  You see, the response to the "attack" meant that OUR missiles would now be launched against our perceived attacker,  the Soviet Union, Russia and its allies in Eastern Europe, so you can imagine the "pucker factor" in Russia, when their surveillance revealed that we had initiated our response to attack them.

Very astute and rapid communications between the Soviets and the U.S. halted the aggression on both sides, and we squeaked out of that fiasco within seconds of our total demise.  That incident had prompted the Russians to begin THEIR defense measures also.  According to sources we came less than a minute away from all out nuclear war between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which would have also included the involvement of allies and foes, Europe, Britain, China, etc.  Such a nuclear exchange would have destroyed much if not all of Life on Earth with the resulting holocaust of radiation.

That was not the only "close call," during the Cold War.  There were others that have been revealed, such as the one during the Cuban Missile Crisis, in which a Soviet Captain of a submarine, ready to launch a nuke at a U.S. ship was stopped by Russian officer aboard that outranked him.  That was at a time, when the Soviets and the Americans were on nuclear hair-trigger alert in that confrontation just off our southeastern shore.

There was another "lucky intervention," by a U.S. spy embedded in the Soviet forces, who alerted the Americans to refrain from certain actions that were going to cause the Soviets to launch a nuclear attack against the U.S. because they believed the U.S. was preparing to launch a first strike against them.

These near-fatal catastrophic incidents point to questions that must be asked, in light of the false alarm in Hawaii.  Those questions are:

*  Is there more to that incident in Hawaii than we have been led to believe?

*  Is the political blame game, the accusations and counter-punches that are occurring via the media, a ruse to cover up what actually happened?

*  Was there actually a missile launched at Hawaii that sensors detected that caused the alarm?

*  If there was actually a missile, was it actually shot down?

*  If there was a missile en route to Hawaii, did our defenses work as they should have?

*  Did we actually avert a nuclear war by creating a narrative that this was only a mistake by a technician, thereby preventing a devastating retaliation, possibly against China, North Korea, and Russia?

*  Did the perceived attack trigger our mainland national defenses?

*  If our national defense actions and responses were triggered, did that affect our adversaries and enemies?

*  Were our adversaries and enemies caused to be on alert due to our defenses being activated?

*  Did our adversaries and enemies arm themselves and initiate retaliation procedures as a result of our defenses being activated?

*  Would not an adversary or an enemy take preemptive measures and initiate defensive measures until they knew for certain that the incident in Hawaii was not a pretext by the U.S. to launch a first strike nuclear attack against North Korea or another enemy?

*  Was this actually an incident of our systems of alert being hacked by an enemy to cause us to launch an attack against an adversary or an enemy?

*  If that was the case, who hacked us and how will we respond to that attack?

These are not rhetorical questions.  These are questions we should be asking and demanding answers from our elected officials, our representatives, and from our government employees.
Why are we (are you?)  so easily satisfied with the quick answer that a lowly technician simply pushed the wrong button; that the alert was cancelled; and that everything is now hunky-dory?

Or is the prospect of raising these issues too scary to confront?

Monday, September 25, 2017

Protesting the NFL ....

Vanguards of Freedom

Today a celebrated few pretend to protest "wrongs" by attacking the very symbols of Freedom that gained for them the right to protest.  This time they do it at football games, refusing to stand, as is customary, for the national anthem.

Everyone knows the protest is a sham.  It is simply a swipe at the celebration of respect for our flag and our military, that which has made our country the bastion and beacon of Freedom that it is.  It is a strike against what we hold dear, "disguised" as a protest of perceived wrongs.

This is not the first time this sort of facade has made an appearance.

Those of you that remember, KNOW what it was like to get reviled:  spit on, accosted, yelled at, discriminated against,  just for wearing your military uniform.

Remember that?  And we also remember those that didn't / couldn't come back from the war.

It brings to mind that some of us are still out there roaming the streets, living in alleys ...  Some of us left much more behind than bad memories. 

I recall well the pictures of a young Jane Fonda, cavorting with the North Vietnamese, the enemy, as some form of "protest?"

Remember those that went to Canada because they did not want to serve?

We fought in battlefields near and far.

We fought so that those here at home could have FREEDOM. We didn't do it for a chosen few. We did it for all our citizens.

And now it is customary to honor those that paid the ultimate price for their country by paying respect to them with our national anthem.  All we have asked is for others to join in to honor them also, for a few seconds at a public event.

But they cannot even do that.

They won't do it because there is nothing of themselves invested in it.  They don't want it. They don't need it.  It's not theirs.

The panty-waist NFL'ers do not even know how to defend the Flag and the Anthem, because it does not belong to them.

They know not what the flag and the anthem stand for, or what they mean, much less what they mean to their patriotic fans.

Socialist/Leftist media and pundits lead the attack of propaganda.  Some pretend to wear the cloak of objectivity to protect their precious jobs, so that tells you what price they sell their loyalty for.  Others propose that there are "more important" issues to confront.

Well, at the bottom of all those issues is exactly this issue of our American foundations.

This is at the root of why criminals that betray our country go free, and Patriots continue to be targeted, punished and repressed by their  Socialist government.

This is WHY the same political elements continue to come back to attack by desecrating and disrespecting our Flag and our Anthem and our fallen fellow warriors.

Apparently there is a President who does understand; who does know; who knows how important this is to Patriots.

That President had the understanding and the courage to stand up to those who think they can bully us into believing that in order to protest some "wrong" we must desecrate that which is dear to us. 

He would not let it stand.  Now he is being attacked, enduring a severe backlash for standing up for warriors who are still serving, for those who served and are still with us, and for those who served and have passed on.

WHERE is the rest of the nation in defense of those who defended THEM?


All those who served.  All those who continue to serve.  All those who stood with the others and faced enemies, so that other Americans did not have to are still here.

We fought for Freedom.  We never stopped fighting for it. WE fought for this because we wanted it.  We took an oath to uphold this, our Flag and our Constitution, and our anthem and all that they stand for, and that oath has never expired.

Today to those who wish to pretend protest to disguise the desecration of that on which their Freedom was built, we issue no warning.  We know your sins. We see your disguises.  We see your outstretched hands as you take the affluence in money, privilege, Freedom and favor that was paid for you in blood.

Today you revel at the expense of others' lives and treasure.

Know this:  Patriots will not let stand the assault on Freedom, because history is not kind to those who trample the Saints of Justice and the Angels of Liberty, for the warriors, the Vanguards of Freedom have always prevailed, and always will.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Too Close for Comfort

The criminal dogs have become rabid, after you discovered them in the chicken coop, bloodied, with chicken parts in their mouths.

This latest convulsion by the lefty socialists against Trump is interestingly coincidental to new revelations about Clinton emails, the discovery of conflicts of interest in the "Special" Counsel, Robert Mueller's investigation team, and potential legal and criminal allegations against former attorney general Lynch, and other Obama administration officials, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, etc.

Like a kid with his hand caught in the cookie jar, their immediate reaction is to throw a fit, scream, "I hate you!" and then riot in order to distract and deflect attention from the crime.

The primary question is or should be, "What have we missed," that we should be getting, because, my word, they are getting hot and heavy with the distractions.

And before you go out and get all misty-eyed about it, let me just point out that very few people who intend to protest peacefully, show up with shields and weapons, and/or ready for confrontation and itching for a fight.

This was planned and it was planned and now continues as a loud, violent "movement" because someone is getting too close to the truth. The solution is not to get distracted, not to withdraw, but to move forward and continue to effect Justice on the criminals that now seem upset that their plans have been discovered and thwarted.

Thursday, June 1, 2017

The Party of Losers

They lost an election they RIGGED, by cheating, spying on Americans, and targeting them.  They abused their power and broke the law. They are trying to cover it up by being accusative and violent and repressive.

You are probably tired of this question, but please, tell me again, WHY are the democrats, who  admittedly  RIGGED the Democrat Primary Election AGAINST Bernie Sanders, accusing the Russians of working with Trump to rig the national elections against Hillary?

The Dems shamelessly admitted to rigging the primary election.  Leaked emails clearly showed this was the case, and Donna Brazile, DNC chairwoman admitted she cheated by giving Presidential debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debate  (see report about this HERE).

When they did that, because they DECIDED by cheating, who would be Trump's challenger, the Democrats RIGGED the national election.

Now they are upset that they lost an election they RIGGED.

Who loses an election they have RIGGED so they can win?

It is beyond embarrassing to them, because once the general population that makes up the Democrat base looks beyond the talking points, and says, "wait a minute, we did what?" ... the DEMOCRAT party is OVER .

So, we now see the a "major" political party of the United States of America, caught in the criminal act of fixing a U.S. election (and then losing it) convulsing, because they were caught and exposed, and manifesting those convulsions by throwing the prolonged and violent tantrums of trying to shut down conservative free speech, and lashing out with contrived accusations of collusion by the duly elected President.  It is a classic case of psychological perplexity, confusion.  Shrinks call this "cognitive dissonance."
  "... In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. The occurrence of cognitive dissonance is consequence of a person's performing an action that contradicts personal beliefs, ideals, and values; and also occurs when confronted with new information that contradicts said beliefs, ideals, and values...In A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957), Leon Festinger proposed that human beings strive for internal psychological consistency in order to mentally function in the real world. That a person who experiences internal inconsistency tends to become psychologically uncomfortable, and so is motivated to reduce the cognitive dissonance: either by changing parts of the cognition, to justify the stressful behavior; or by adding new parts to the cognition that causes the psychological dissonance; and by actively avoiding social situations and contradictory information that are likely to increase the magnitude of the cognitive dissonance..." (Wikipedia)
Furthermore, we have learned in recent days that the Obama administration SPIED, not only on Trump Campaign staff, but on other Americans as well, presumably in order to maintain the "Obama-Clinton dynasty," which is a severe violation of Constitutional mandates, and the laws that govern surveillance of Americans, which violations amount to criminal acts against our nation via governmental abuse of power by targeting perceived political enemies.  See that report HERE

The Democrats ( including "the media." ) are trying to close the gap between what they want their reality to be, and what reality actually is, by attacking Trump with false accusations, and throwing violent tantrums to shut down Conservative free speech.

No, they are not upset because they lost the election and are now in "denial," and want to reconcile two conflicting "realities."

They are upset and are having a psychotic breakdown because they got caught cheating, abusing their power and targeting fellow Americans, and are now attempting to cover that up by staging violent protests and attacking the President, and those that legally elected him to that office.

They have been caught committing criminal acts, and are lashing out to avoid accountability for it.  They exhibit the violent convulsions of a condemned criminal enroute to receive his punishment.

They have been caught and their transgressions exposed.

Why have the perpetrators not been arrested, indicted, tried, and punished?

Saturday, March 4, 2017


These so called "leaks" that are giving Trump so much trouble, are much more than just "leaks."  They are attacks upon the Trump administration by specific people, but they are also a "cover-up."

It may be that the Obama administration, believing that they did not have to erase or cover their tracks for whatever misdeeds or mistakes they may have perpetrated that would be incriminating to them, after the election, because they believed they would be succeeded by Hillary Clinton, after she defeated Donald Trump, left too much available for scrutiny, when the election did not go their way.

Emerging and established events have pointed to the possibility that the Obama administration did not have the opportunity in time and action they deemed sufficient to delete or eradicate acts or items that constituted political and legal and/or moral transgressions.

It appears that their solution was to sabotage, obfuscate and obscure, detract and distract, and to attack the character, ability and integrity of the new administration's appointees and employees.

Their misdeeds, judging from the magnitude of the attacks upon the Trump administration, including paid demonstrators, protesters, rioters; media and pundit propaganda perpetrators, and complicit political actors threatening government action for alleged wrongdoings, must, due to the scope of the sabotage, obfuscation, obscuring, detraction and distraction, be a massive attempt to cover-up an equally or greater quantity of transgression(s) by the Obama administration.

The question(s) now should be, "What are we missing," and/or "What are they attempting to cover-up?"  The question now is "will the Trump administration follow through with a decisive challenge to the attack upon its personnel and endeavors, should the premise of a massive cover-up be true."

Another question is, "will Trump supporters, i.e., those voters that elected him, and allies that support him, provide sufficient support to aid his administration to best his opponents once and for all?"

Where do you stand, and what will you do, as this development in history unfolds before you?