A Brief Note

A "Brief Note"

Do you recall who went to war in WW2 before the U.S. joined in?  The two main players were the National Socialists of Germany, and the International Socialists of the Russian Soviet Union. There were other players, but those were the main two entities.

The U.S. joined sides with the International Socialists against the National Socialists. The U.S. helped the International Socialists defeat the National Socialists.

An anecdotal incident occurred in the aftermath of "the war," even before the smoke cleared. The U.S. secretly employed the National Socialist War Criminals, in order to gain from the German military and "scientific" advances.

You can read about that HERE...    You can also read about this HERE...

In effect, the U.S. betrayed its "ally" The International Communist, Soviet Union.

There is also this: Operation Paperclip

What generally gets overlooked is how deep the U.S. had sunk into the Nationalist Socialist abyss.

Nationalism is nation-centric purpose; that is, a national policy, both internal and foreign, which focuses on the interests of the nation itself.  If the nation is also Marxist, well, then it is a "National" Socialist nation.   The goal of Socialism is the Communist utopia.

International Socialists want an international global government made up of individual socialist countries that cede their authority to an international global government.

We know the conflict between these two "forces," from our observations of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

The dynamics of these two forces can be seen to play out in many countries today. An example of this is Mexico.  Mexico's political spectrum consists of a multitude of Socialist political parties, some National, Some International.  Two of the major of these parties are the PRI and the PAN. Partido Accion Nacional (National Action Party) and the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (Revolutionary Institutional Party).  The former is "National" and the latter is "International."  There is overlap.  It's important to note, that there is no non Socialist party in Mexico. It is all Karl Marx or a version thereof. There are probably local parties here and there that may not be Socialist, but none that make any difference.  One does not rock the boat in Mexico.

I grew up along the border; witnessed the shenanigans of local, state, and national Mexico politics.  It was eye opening, when viewing and learning about U.S. politics.

The observation was that we have the same thing here, hidden under a facade of a Constitutional Republic, with a two party system of Democratic Freedom.  We have two Socialist parties, who perpetuate the necessary lies to carry out the pretense of warring with each other, and indeed do so to the extent that they do battle to dominate as either national Socialists, or International Socialists, both sides maintaining that THEY are the real Constitutionalists.

Somewhere in the commotion is our Constitution, which both sides use to achieve domination, legally and politically, over the other.

The hard truth is that both sides will attack and thwart the creation and development of a "true" Constitutional Republic, because it is diametrically opposed to the deeply entrenched socialist communist goals, plans, purposes, economies, and culture.

The culture is Marxist.

Our current culture is so immersed... drowned in Marxist materialistic culture that few, if any see above and beyond that enough to rise above the "Left-Right," so called "conflict."

They are two ends of the same stick of tyranny with which you will be clubbed.

It is a severe form of brainwashing that is kept in play with constant propaganda and a culture of danger and crisis meant to keep the populations stressed, distracted, subdued, and controlled.

The first step towards emerging from this is to face these elements, confront them, and extract oneself mentally, spiritually, and physically from them, figuring out how to survive and grow and expand within them, and join with others to inform, educate and expand. It is not a not formidable task.

Vanguard of Freedom

BASIC PREMISE

Basic Premise:

It's what your "reality" is based on. More precisely, it's what YOU have established that your "reality" is based on.

It's your "rock," your "base," your "foundation."  Basic Premise.

Politicos, terrorists, propagandists, con artists, criminals, marketing specialists:  They all know about "Basic Premise."

What they know is this:  They know that your psychological, mental, emotional (or whatever you want to call it) existence, or "well being," is based on your Basic Premise and the conclusions and logic or beliefs that flow from it.

They also know, that if they "upset" or unbalance, or somehow threaten or destroy your "Basic Premise," your "rock," your "foundation... they can cause you great anxiety, emotional upheaval, uncertainty, worry, fear, panic, etc.

This is what happened on Sept. 11, 2001 or as we have come to know it, 9/11.

This is what terrorists do when they carry out an act of terrorism. Their intent is to cause your "Basic Premise" to become upset. In that state of mind and emotion, you are more easily manipulated.

Calamitous events, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, power outages, tend to do the same to people.

On a smaller scale, your Basic Premise can be upset or destroyed by a traumatic accident: Traffic accident, a fire at home, a sudden traumatic illness (heart attack, stroke, etc.)

These can upset your sanity, your state of mind, your emotional well being, your ability to think clearly.

Most of us know about this. Many of us have experienced this.

Many of us military personnel know all too well how this works.

Some of us can get "stuck" in the "upset" of our Basic Premise.  We can lose our "balance" and remain unbalanced.  Sometimes some do not recover.

What many do not know is how to get back your "balance," how to put back your Basic Premise or how to create a new one, and build a new reality.

Ask any calamitous event survivor and they will tell you that they had to establish a new foundation, a new "Base,"  New Basic Premises, in order to come out of the trauma... out of the instability.

How do you do this?  How do you become "grounded" when you are panicked?

If you break it down, there are two, three or just a few more steps you can do to get "unpanicked."

1.  The first thing to do is ACKNOWLEDGE that you have been panicked, upset, traumatized, hurt, injured.... whatever the DESTABILIZED situation is.  ACKNOWLEDGE IT. Realize you are in it.

2.  The second thing you can do is to calm yourself down.  If you are anxious and hyperventilating or rambling about, ranting and raving, or simply just nervous as hell, or crying or want to scream... calm yourself down.  Calm down by looking at something that is standing still.  Find a rock, a building, a tree, a chair, a piece of ground. and observe that it is sitting still.  Then find another. Then another.  You might not have time to linger on this and might have to do it quickly. You may have had a burst of adrenaline that might be making you hyper active.  If that's the case, this step might take some effort.   However, you might also use your adrenaline rush to your advantage by calming yourself just enough, yet use your heightened state to boost yourself into action.

Some of you, once you do this can find stability by praying.  If that's not for you then continue anyway.

3. Once you are calm, or calmer, then you can begin to prioritize your actions.  Set up a mental checklist of things to do, and start to do them.

4. Establish your order of priorities with safety first.  Get away rapidly from danger. Stop bleeding, get to a safe and secure area. If you are in danger of attack by someone or something, get to a defensible and "defendable" position.  If your situation is simply that you are without food or shelter, then make that your priority.

The point is, regardless of the trauma or calamity, or disaster, 1. Acknowledge.  2. Calm Down. 3. Take action while prioritizing. 4. Get Safe and Secure.

5.  Make a plan of action. This is a general outline what you have to do to get back to "Basic Premise."

6.  Work out the individual things you have to do to carry out that plan.  Make a list of these actions, into steps.

7.  Assign time to these items. Some require more immediate action than others. Set the time limits.

8.  Establish a discipline of things you have to do to get these things done.

You may have to cycle through this several times a day, until it becomes "routine," until you establish a discipline or a "ritual of survival."

These sets of actions can be done in a few minutes, and they can be expanded to be done for more lengthy handlings for extended period of times, to include more than just you, and can be developed into operation modes for large organizations and numbers of people.

You can bring order where there is none, and thus improve survival and well being for yourself and for others, either as a leader or someone who is helping others or as a member of a group.

Perhaps you have been "upset" by a calamitous event in the past.  Perhaps you have gotten somewhat stuck in a traumatic event in the past.  Perhaps this can help you come out of it, even if it is just a little bit. Let me know if this helps.

I want to know what works for you and how you have handled calamitous, upsetting situations.  Let me know:

Let me know how it goes:  advanceoffreedom@gmail.com

Vanguards Of Freedom:

You are witnessing what some call "The New World Order."   I'm not talking about repressive measures or oppressive regimes. I am referring to the obvious demonstration of blatantly stupid, arrogant INCOMPETENCE.  This is the modus operandi of "The Powers That Be."

No, not the handling of a global pandemic, but its cause. In this time, in this age, in this era, this is what you see unfolding before you.

I say to you. NO ONE is in Charge.

Have you had enough of the propaganda?

Have you Had enough of the illusion that you're still living in a Constitutional Republic?

Are you completely fed up with how sociopaths run this nation. The world?

Are you fed up with chaos and conflict being  more the norm than the exception?

Have you had enough of conspiracy theories, that blame super rich, blue-blood psychotics for everything that is wrong with the cultures of earth?

Are you fed up with those that blame societal conditions on aliens from outer space?  On the oil cartels?  On the drug cartels?

Are you done with incessant doom and gloom predictions that merely perpetuate deteriorating conditions and promote a culture that dictates that you should just give up and wait for the coming holocaust?

You and I could solve the major problems in our neighborhood over a cup of coffee or a beer this weekend. And yet, look a the world.

Pretending there is a government does not make it so.

The mob of collectivism cannot perceive itself outside its own prison. Only when emancipated individuals come  together, is a True Group possible.

Every cloud has a silver lining. If you're not one of the panic stricken victims, here is your silver lining.

"...People sleep peacefully in their beds at night because they do not depend on rough men to do violence on their behalf; they are prepared to do it for themselves..."



Vanguard of Freedom HEADLINERS....

It's Not Going To Happen, So Calm Down and Get To Work...

A Revolution, an E.M.P. attack, the end of the world as we know it, and other catastrophes:  It's not going to happen.

Why?

It's not happening because it costs too much.

There is too much to lose. It would be too expensive, and too many criminals would be put out in any uncontrolled fiasco.

Right off the bat, if the U.S. were to experience an EMP attack, that is, an electromagnetic pulse attack, which purportedly would destroy the entire or a large part of our electric/electronic "grid," the damage would affect greatly, the drug cartels, the human traffickers, and all the secondary beneficiaries of those criminal enterprises.  THEY are not going to put up with some ninny cutting into their profits, and these are only a minute portion of those who profit from the status quo.

There are mega-profits to be made by keeping you and yours terrified and insecure, unable, and powerless.

The countless wars and conflicts between opposing players, anywhere and everywhere in the world, such as East versus West, Commie versus Capitalist, if you look closely enough, can be seen to be orchestrated, conducted, and scripted by big money, by one player or another.

At some point, for example, Patriots are going to wake up to the fact that gun sales are to a large degree orchestrated after one side claims and demands immediate gun control, and the other side asserts the right to buy guns.  It's amazing that this is a win-win situation for all sides, because the gun controllers get their political jolts, the gun rights patriots get their political jolts, and gun sales sky rocket. I think you agree, some find there is money in politicizing a tragic event.

This is not to say that you should not arm yourself. Quite the contrary.  Just note the results of this dynamic.

Here's another "fer instance."  Let's say a gang of criminals opened up a casino where it was legal to do so, and started making money, hand over fist.  Do you think those criminals would, for a minute, put up with some wacko causing a ruckus in their establishment, because he wanted to protest racism or some other perceived wrong done to him?  I submit that they would put period to him very quickly one way or another, to keep the money rolling in.

Poverty is very profitable, not for the poor, of course, but for those who administrate the programs to help the poor, whether they do it via government or through non-profits.  And these enterprises translate into political clout, which can be cashed in for political mega-bucks.

The snake oil salesman always had to convince people of a particular ailment, when he offered his miracle potion as the cure.  Then he had to keep them sick so he could keep pushing his endless solutions for never ending ailments.

Oh, and what keeps people ill?  What's a major cause of mental illness?  Illness, real or imaginary is apparently, to a great degree, the result of stress.

And what are the triggers for stress?  Can you list them?  Terrorism, deadly diseases, war, financial problems, marital problems... Can you think of any more?

That's not to say that someone might not come up with an idea to poison your water to keep the doctors busy.  After all, they need jobs too.

As politics goes, would you happen to know how much money has been spent in the totality of campaigns at the national, state, county, and municipal levels in the last ten years?  Has enough currency been printed to be able to cover that amount?

I know, I know.  Our candidate is different. He is our candidate, our man, our woman.  And no, we can't back off campaigning for our guy or gal, nor can we not vote and let the other side win.  This is not about stopping the train and getting off at the next station. This is about being aware of the train, and being a little more aware, so that we are not terrorized, scammed, or coerced into believing that the earth is going to implode, that a new ice age is being ushered in by a giant volcano next Tuesday, or that if you don't buy the crooked preacher's sermon you will go straight to hell on Wednesday.

Ironically, your best buddy for keeping the world as you know it from ending, are the cartels and the gangs.  That's amazing, since your well being is actually dependent on the very criminal that is destroying your family.  Another painful twist is that the politician that is bilking you, the tax payer, and being paid bribes left and right, or coerced by criminals to act on their behalf, can only do so at your behest.  Wrap your head around that one.

The dynamics of these things are absurd.

Even so, do beware.  There are psychos that would set off a catastrophe to act out their sordid fantasy.

Do prepare, take stock and do take care of yourself and yours. There is a way out of this, and it starts with the smallest unit of existence:  You.  Take charge of your Life.  If it has not "gone your way," up to now, change it.  It's ok to change your modus-operandi.  Find a workable one for YOU and yours, and then expand outwards from there.

Gather, collect, and store a survival package for you and your family, so that you can survive a natural or contrived catastrophe.  You will do no one any good if you were to expire. Survive the catastrophe, and then survive the aftermath.  Be ready, and you will not be affected so much by threats of immediate, impending or gradual wholesale demise.

And above all, remember: Keep it Legal.  Don't be pushed into illegal scams or "secret" societies or groups.  Chances are such groups are set up to entrap you to be criminally liable for someone else's benefit.  These days there is no such thing as "secrecy" for individuals or groups, so don't buy that tonic.  Stay on the up and up.  Your loved ones will need you around, when things get difficult.

The "end of the world" is not going to happen tomorrow, or the day after, so calm down, calm others down, and continue your positive efforts.  And thank you for what you do, and for being a Vanguard of Freedom.

YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN OVERTHROWN...

The Mueller Special Counsel investigation is not an indictment investigation.... because a sitting President cannot be indicted.

What, then, is Mueller doing? This is an impeachment investigation.

Sirius Satellite Radio Show host, Mark Levin, explained last night that Mueller's investigation belongs to the House of Representatives... NOT the Justice Department.

The indictments Mueller has brought forth are all Justice actions that do not require a Special Prosecutor. I cite as examples: The Tax violations charges could have been done by the IRS. The other charges could have been done by the Justice Dept.

Mueller does not have "constitutionality," and must be stopped, and the proper investigatory body then created in the House of Representatives, if THEY deem it necessary.

What Mueller's investigation IS doing is looking for POSSIBLE crimes for the impeachment process, which has a different standard and rules,

Mueller's existence in the Justice Dept., as a "Prosecutor" with other prosecutors as staff, and a staff of FBI agent/investigators comprise an unconstitutional body, because there is no CRIME to prosecute. It is a fishing expedition to set up an impeachment process.

That was Mark Levin's assessment and analysis on this matter.

I go a step further:  Mueller's actions constitute, not an attempted coup, not an attempt to OVERTHROW a duly elected government, it IS THE COUP.

Mueller and Co. HAS already OVERTHROWN the Trump administration and the millions of citizens who voted him into office. Mueller has PRE-EMPTED the impeachment process by interfering with a duly elected government.

The evidence is not speculative, it is not conjectured, it is OBSERVATIONAL. The Mueller investigative usurpers have covertly effected a COUP under the guise of an investigatory body.

That the Justice Department does not act to rectify this, is rapidly making the DOJ complicit in this travesty.

We cannot and must not stand idly by and allow this to continue. A squad of lawyers, with the backing and the power of force of arms, has hijacked our country for purposes other than those expressed in our nation's founding documents.

The Mueller "team," which includes the political party of Socialists and those that are in collusion with it, that is acting to usurp a duly elected government, KNOWS that Trump cannot be indicted.

All the individuals participating and supporting that coup are free to opine and to protest the new Trump government, as is allowed within our laws.  No one is trying to silence or stop them from their protest and forms of persuasion.

But when a rogue, unconstitutional entity, uses its legal and investigatory powers, backed by the enforcement arm of the government, with the power of the use of force of arms, it is no longer a matter of protest, it has become an armed insurrection against a legal, duly elected government.


The Executive Branch continues to operate, seemingly oblivious to this COUP, having, metaphorically speaking, "recused," itself from defending the office of the President, the Presidency, and thus the millions of Americans that the Administration represents, in similar fashion to the way the Attorney General has recused himself as the head of the Justice Department.

The Attorney General has allowed the hijacking of the Justice Department by agents who are armed and taking action against American Citizens.

A government has been weaponized by agents, which include former government intelligence operatives, and current ones, and armed police agents, against its own citizens.

If you feel the shutting down of your freedom of expression by the Social Media Entities, Facebook, Google, Twitter, is an affront and an attack on your Civil Rights and Freedoms, you will have something to behold, namely the full outright repression of your religious beliefs, your power to earn a living, and your right to your pursuit of happiness, if the Sun of Liberty is allowed to set on our Constitutional Republic.

The usurpers must be rendered powerless against us, that we may retain our Constitutional Republic, and its laws, and that we may move forward with the Free exercise of our Freedoms, safe and secure from those who would impede them.

Patriots:  How should we proceed?

CONFLICT MONGERS VS. VANGUARD OF FREEDOM

You might have heard of the "agent provocateur," an agent whose mission is to covertly join an organization and make its members commit illegal acts in order to compromise the target organization, getting its members arrested, and sent to jail. But there is another agent, whose purpose is much broader, and in some cases encompasses and includes the Agent Provocateur.

Conflict Mongers specialize in creating conflicts. They get you and your friend to have a conflict. Joe, a conflict monger, who has worked to gain your confidence, tells your friend Bill, that you said Bill was an idiot. Then Joe comes to you and tells you that Bill made a pass at your wife. The result: You and Bill fight.

The Conflict Monger craft is not limited to personal relationships. Nations, political organizations, weapons dealers, international bankers, and media and propagandists, use Conflict Mongers to profit from the conflicts they create.

Weapons dealers incite two sides of a political equation to go to war, so that they can profit from arms sales to both sides.

International bankers can profit from such a conflict by financing both sides to go to war and then profit from the resulting "reconstruction" period after the war.

Financial and Capital manipulators will tamper with the stock market to create the rise and fall of stocks and bonds, and reap the benefit of that manipulation.

In the intelligence field, it is common to find on both sides of a political equation, Conflict Mongers working feverishly to create chaos inside the enemy camp. An organization with internal conflict is much easier to conquer or control, than one that can muster a united front against its enemies.

In an example much closer to home, you will see Conservative social network web sites, sometimes in conflict with each other. To the uninitiated it may seem that one side has attacked the other, and that the other is merely defending itself. Upon closer examination you might find, however, that a Conflict Monger has created a conflict between both sides, in order to destroy that web site or to destroy both web sites by "stoking the fires."

And one might have also experienced a web site's members in conflict amongst themselves. Again we may find a Conflict Monger agent at work.

While an "Agent Provocateur" would work to get a web site to publish copyrighted material in its blogs, post messages on the web site blogs or forums that included hate speech or threats of violence, and perhaps even go as far as to get one of its members to commit to doing something illegal, a Conflict Monger would go further and create antagonism within a group and even possibly between two or more groups with the aim of destroying the credibility of the group, or even to cause the group to cease to exist.

And there is nothing that says that the Agent Provocateur(s) and the Conflict Monger(s), might be one and the same, and is working to both, compromise the group by tricking it into doing something illegal, AND to create conflict between a web site's members and between different groups.

It is particularly difficult on the internet to know who is who, because the internet provides a degree of anonymity, and lends itself to such subterfuge. It is here that one has to remain alert to these "agents," because the internet, social networking sites, and related communications functions and devices are a major part of Conservative advancement within the last year.

After Obama succeeded in winning the 2008 election, his effort was heralded to have flourished via the internet and has been touted as a major influence in his victory. Although it might have had a significant impact, it pales in comparison to the evolution of Conservative efforts via the internet. Conservative advances via the internet have not received much attention in the National Socialist propaganda media, but without a doubt, Conservative organizational accomplishments dwarf the results of its opponents.

The combination of the internet social networking, along with Talk Radio, and the Conservative forums on Fox News has created a formula that is serving at this time, Conservative causes and purposes.

This makes Conservative efforts a major target of its opponents. Just as the White House chose to attack Fox News, during the Obama Administration, because it would not give in to the National Socialist agenda, It would be foolish not to expect infiltration and attempts at disruption of Conservative Social Networks, web sites, and blogs.

It might not be easy to spot an Agent Provocateur or a Conflict Monger, but if one is alert, one might discover such a culprit busily at work in your group by observing the following:

1. Understand the efforts and purpose of the group or web site that you join.

2. Observe the communication of its members. Which member's communication does not align to the purposes of the group?

3. Which member does not abide by the stated, published rules or policy of the group?

4. Which member is communicating negatively against other members, without just cause?

5. Which member is carrying on a "whispering campaign" about other members or the web site.  Which one is constantly advertising and recruiting for other groups?

6. One of the best ways to "show up" or expose Conflict Mongers is to create an organization or group that strictly adheres to its purpose, and promotes and advances those purposes accordingly. Anyone who deviates from the purpose can be noticed or can become obvious by being the one whose actions show that he is in conflict with the organization and its purposes. "Ye shall know them by their deeds." Sound familiar?

7. And then there is that one member that just does not understand, and is constantly asking you to explain things to them, doesn't seem to be able to get with the program, or needs to be "baby-sat." While there may be novices, who do need a certain amount of attention, how hard can it be to be a Conservative? One either is or isn't. One tells them to get with the program: Educate them with references and keep them in your radar. But be wary. That member might just have another agenda.

8. One might also know "the connections" of a member to members of the oppostion. While there might be a professional connection, to what extent does that association affect their affiliation to your group?

9. Take notes. If someone says or does things that do not align to the purposes of your group, note them down. These may show up later in another venue on another web site being promoted by someone under a different name. These notes can become a "trail of illogic" that might lead you to thwart an attempt to disrupt your activities.

10. Take responsibility for your self and your group. The success of Conservative Groups is the result of the actions of its members. It is YOU who are responsible for your group, and you can make a significant difference in its success.

11. If a conflict does arise, and/or if one is in full swing already, do not promote it or advertise it. This only feeds the conflict and detracts from your group's agenda or cause. The more you repeat information about the conflict, the more you promote or enhance it. Figure out a way to handle it quickly, resolve it, identify the Conflict Monger, and get on with your work.

It is important to know also what is a Conservative, a Liberal, a Socialist, a Libertarian, a Rino, a Moderate, a Blue Dog Democrat, and an Independent. The differences are significant.

Around the time of the 2008 election, many so-called Conservative Social Networks were created, and while these served as the basis for the eventual flourisihing of a flurry of Conservative activity on the internet, some of the original web sites advertised as being "Center-Right" sites, seeking to create a coalition of members ranging from "moderate" Republicans to Conservative stalwarts.

Since that time the differences in the various factions have become more obvious, particularly in the national political arena, and membership has shifted within and between those groups. Accordingly members of the opposition have capitalized on the differences between the groups to cause friction.

The point of this article is not to promote the "umbrella" or "big tent" idea of a broad based coalition of "center-right" groups to defeat the National Socialist Democrats. It is to alert Conservative Groups to the situation that their groups might be attacked from within as well as from outside of the group by Conflict Monger agents, seeking to cause discord with the intent of rendering their efforts ineffective.,

Principled Conservatives, who will not compromise on core issues simply for the sake of obtaining a vote in favor of a particular issue, and who refuse to make "deals with the devil" will prosper by continuing to build and further establish grass-root efforts, magnifying and expanding the causes of the Conservative Cultural Revolution, and work to point out the exact differences that will create our Renaissance of Freedom.

It is not only prudent to say, "THIS is what we stand for," and demand that those purposes be promoted, preserved and advanced.  It is necessary to our survival as a nation that we make it clear that the folly of the issues of other groups, their political correctness, their lack of a foundation of Life based on moral and ethical principles, will result in a deterioration of their cultures, as is evident today across this country and throughout the world.

It is optimum to point out our PURPOSES, which define us, and what those purposes are based on, and to use this as a flag and a rallying point. The gray area of "coalition," of political correctness, of inclusion, of compromise with our principles only results in a watered-down culture unable to survive the hard realities of dangerous and determined enemies.

While we have not yet attained Vanguards that are the epitome of perfection, we can recognize which ones will advance our Causes, and which will not, and when they do, we support them, while when they do not, we must hold them accountable.

And finally, a factor that is vital to knowledge about "The Conflict Mongers," is this:  The American culture has been invaded by a foreign, antagonistic, aggressively hostile culture. It is, what is known at Vanguard of Freedom, as the Socialist Cult of Mass Murder.  This culture has invaded our nation and now has occupied it, and has colonized it.  The SCOMM continues to advance is culture of death and to destroy the positive elements of American Culture, especially that aspect of American culture that includes it's Christian Fundamentals.  The SCOMM extracts its tribute from our nation by plundering through endless forms of taxation, under the guise of "redistribution of the wealth."  The SCOMM finances through taxes, its activities and attacks upon American culture, and uses politically Liberal persons and groups, and in fact, now dominates almost entirely all Liberal factions in this nation, and has effectively merged Liberals into the SCOMM.  Agents of the SCOMM, their adherents, commonly use the proverbial "We" to denigrate our culture:

"We are deteriorating as a nation." "We Americans have caused violence against other nations."  "We Americans enslaved Black Americans."  We Americans defeated and wiped out Native Americans."  "We are a divided nation, country, etc.

There is no "WE" in these matters.  When used by the SCOMM, they are using this as a downgrade and denigration of American Culture, and are working towards its demise, by recruiting prospective members who are weak members of American Culture.  There is an American Culture.  Its Vanguards of Freedom still hold true to its principles and its tenets. Vanguards of Freedom continue the fight against the Socialist Cult of Mass Murder, and we continue to create within our communities our Renaissance of Freedom.

When we are clear about what we stand for, clear about not compromising with our basic purposes, we will advance accordingly in our Cause. The deeds of the National Socialists have illuminated the differences between "us" and "them," and we must now trumpet those differences to the political and cultural gray areas.

Is our side the side of political cronyism, back room deals, hidden agendas, outright or covert bribery, sell-outs to the highest bidder, permissive and promiscuous cultural values, materialism, decadence, and the inability to answer attacks against our nation because we are too wishy washy to call an enemy an enemy?

The answer is NO WE ARE NOT.

We are not the Conflict Mongers, nor the Agent Provocateurs, and refuse to be the enablers of such agents of doom. What then are we?

We are the Vanguard of Freedom, the Advance of Freedom, and we aim to bring about a Renaissance of Freedom via the American Conservative Cultural Revolution.

Ground Zero: Hawaii

After the emergency and the panic caused by the false alarm, that there was a nuclear missile on its way to Hawaii, the finger pointing and blame game began.  Whose fault was it?  Who needed to be accountable?

Naturally people were upset for all the right reasons: They thought they had but a few minutes of Life left to live.  You can imagine the panic and confusion.

It was a mistake, it turns out, an error.  Someone pushed the "wrong button."

Such incidents unfortunately have happened before.  In those cases nuclear catastrophe was imminent, and was not a "false alarm."

Usually it is kept very quiet, and the Hawaii incident is no different.  What has not been mentioned are the disastrous and catastrophic effects that I can only surmise, occurred not just in Hawaii, but in the rest of the world, as that unfortunate incident was unfolding.

Nuclear "mistakes" do not happen in a vacuum.

We are prone to believe that the nuclear warning mistake was contained to Hawaii, but that unfortunately, even if you prefer believing in Santa Claus, is not the case.  Nuclear warnings and alarms, by design, trigger potentially catastrophic responses and actions that can be devastating to the entire planet.

A perceived threat against U.S. territory or an ally,  will set in motion sets of predetermined actions that will trigger massive defensive and offensive actions by our forces internationally in response to the threat.

Additionally this also triggers massive defensive and offensive actions by our allies, and by our adversaries and enemies internationally.

A flock of geese crossed into the U.S. from Canada, for example, last century, and the NORAD early warning system "read" those geese as missiles instead of as a jet.  That radar system was programmed to exclude jets, airliners, and other planes by detecting them as "air breathers,"  with engines that pulled in air in the front and let it out the back.  It was programmed to detect "non-air breathers,"  which would be, missiles.

That system read the flock of geese as missiles, and it set off alarms immediately.  The early warning system did its job.  It warned our military, not that an attack was imminent, but that it was in progress.  It had read that missiles had been launched and they had crossed into our air space, and nuclear bombs would be exploding imminently.  Of course that was horrifying news to all who experienced the alarm.

But that was not all there was to be horrified about.

That system also triggered the U.S. response to the perceived "attack."  You see, the response to the "attack" meant that OUR missiles would now be launched against our perceived attacker,  the Soviet Union, Russia and its allies in Eastern Europe, so you can imagine the "pucker factor" in Russia, when their surveillance revealed that we had initiated our response to attack them.

Very astute and rapid communications between the Soviets and the U.S. halted the aggression on both sides, and we squeaked out of that fiasco within seconds of our total demise.  That incident had prompted the Russians to begin THEIR defense measures also.  According to sources we came less than a minute away from all out nuclear war between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, which would have also included the involvement of allies and foes, Europe, Britain, China, etc.  Such a nuclear exchange would have destroyed much if not all of Life on Earth with the resulting holocaust of radiation.

That was not the only "close call," during the Cold War.  There were others that have been revealed, such as the one during the Cuban Missile Crisis, in which a Soviet Captain of a submarine, ready to launch a nuke at a U.S. ship was stopped by Russian officer aboard that outranked him.  That was at a time, when the Soviets and the Americans were on nuclear hair-trigger alert in that confrontation just off our southeastern shore.

There was another "lucky intervention," by a U.S. spy embedded in the Soviet forces, who alerted the Americans to refrain from certain actions that were going to cause the Soviets to launch a nuclear attack against the U.S. because they believed the U.S. was preparing to launch a first strike against them.

These near-fatal catastrophic incidents point to questions that must be asked, in light of the false alarm in Hawaii.  Those questions are:

*  Is there more to that incident in Hawaii than we have been led to believe?

*  Is the political blame game, the accusations and counter-punches that are occurring via the media, a ruse to cover up what actually happened?

*  Was there actually a missile launched at Hawaii that sensors detected that caused the alarm?

*  If there was actually a missile, was it actually shot down?

*  If there was a missile en route to Hawaii, did our defenses work as they should have?

*  Did we actually avert a nuclear war by creating a narrative that this was only a mistake by a technician, thereby preventing a devastating retaliation, possibly against China, North Korea, and Russia?

*  Did the perceived attack trigger our mainland national defenses?

*  If our national defense actions and responses were triggered, did that affect our adversaries and enemies?

*  Were our adversaries and enemies caused to be on alert due to our defenses being activated?

*  Did our adversaries and enemies arm themselves and initiate retaliation procedures as a result of our defenses being activated?

*  Would not an adversary or an enemy take preemptive measures and initiate defensive measures until they knew for certain that the incident in Hawaii was not a pretext by the U.S. to launch a first strike nuclear attack against North Korea or another enemy?

*  Was this actually an incident of our systems of alert being hacked by an enemy to cause us to launch an attack against an adversary or an enemy?

*  If that was the case, who hacked us and how will we respond to that attack?


These are not rhetorical questions.  These are questions we should be asking and demanding answers from our elected officials, our representatives, and from our government employees.
Why are we (are you?)  so easily satisfied with the quick answer that a lowly technician simply pushed the wrong button; that the alert was cancelled; and that everything is now hunky-dory?


Or is the prospect of raising these issues too scary to confront?

Protesting the NFL ....

Vanguards of Freedom

Today a celebrated few pretend to protest "wrongs" by attacking the very symbols of Freedom that gained for them the right to protest.  This time they do it at football games, refusing to stand, as is customary, for the national anthem.

Everyone knows the protest is a sham.  It is simply a swipe at the celebration of respect for our flag and our military, that which has made our country the bastion and beacon of Freedom that it is.  It is a strike against what we hold dear, "disguised" as a protest of perceived wrongs.

This is not the first time this sort of facade has made an appearance.

Those of you that remember, KNOW what it was like to get reviled:  spit on, accosted, yelled at, discriminated against,  just for wearing your military uniform.

Remember that?  And we also remember those that didn't / couldn't come back from the war.

It brings to mind that some of us are still out there roaming the streets, living in alleys ...  Some of us left much more behind than bad memories. 

I recall well the pictures of a young Jane Fonda, cavorting with the North Vietnamese, the enemy, as some form of "protest?"

Remember those that went to Canada because they did not want to serve?

We fought in battlefields near and far.

We fought so that those here at home could have FREEDOM. We didn't do it for a chosen few. We did it for all our citizens.

And now it is customary to honor those that paid the ultimate price for their country by paying respect to them with our national anthem.  All we have asked is for others to join in to honor them also, for a few seconds at a public event.

But they cannot even do that.

They won't do it because there is nothing of themselves invested in it.  They don't want it. They don't need it.  It's not theirs.

The panty-waist NFL'ers do not even know how to defend the Flag and the Anthem, because it does not belong to them.

They know not what the flag and the anthem stand for, or what they mean, much less what they mean to their patriotic fans.

Socialist/Leftist media and pundits lead the attack of propaganda.  Some pretend to wear the cloak of objectivity to protect their precious jobs, so that tells you what price they sell their loyalty for.  Others propose that there are "more important" issues to confront.

Well, at the bottom of all those issues is exactly this issue of our American foundations.

This is at the root of why criminals that betray our country go free, and Patriots continue to be targeted, punished and repressed by their  Socialist government.

This is WHY the same political elements continue to come back to attack by desecrating and disrespecting our Flag and our Anthem and our fallen fellow warriors.

Apparently there is a President who does understand; who does know; who knows how important this is to Patriots.

That President had the understanding and the courage to stand up to those who think they can bully us into believing that in order to protest some "wrong" we must desecrate that which is dear to us. 

He would not let it stand.  Now he is being attacked, enduring a severe backlash for standing up for warriors who are still serving, for those who served and are still with us, and for those who served and have passed on.

WHERE is the rest of the nation in defense of those who defended THEM?

WHERE?

All those who served.  All those who continue to serve.  All those who stood with the others and faced enemies, so that other Americans did not have to are still here.

We fought for Freedom.  We never stopped fighting for it. WE fought for this because we wanted it.  We took an oath to uphold this, our Flag and our Constitution, and our anthem and all that they stand for, and that oath has never expired.

Today to those who wish to pretend protest to disguise the desecration of that on which their Freedom was built, we issue no warning.  We know your sins. We see your disguises.  We see your outstretched hands as you take the affluence in money, privilege, Freedom and favor that was paid for you in blood.

Today you revel at the expense of others' lives and treasure.

Know this:  Patriots will not let stand the assault on Freedom, because history is not kind to those who trample the Saints of Justice and the Angels of Liberty, for the warriors, the Vanguards of Freedom have always prevailed, and always will.

Too Close for Comfort

The criminal dogs have become rabid, after you discovered them in the chicken coop, bloodied, with chicken parts in their mouths.

This latest convulsion by the lefty socialists against Trump is interestingly coincidental to new revelations about Clinton emails, the discovery of conflicts of interest in the "Special" Counsel, Robert Mueller's investigation team, and potential legal and criminal allegations against former attorney general Lynch, and other Obama administration officials, Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, etc.

Like a kid with his hand caught in the cookie jar, their immediate reaction is to throw a fit, scream, "I hate you!" and then riot in order to distract and deflect attention from the crime.

The primary question is or should be, "What have we missed," that we should be getting, because, my word, they are getting hot and heavy with the distractions.

And before you go out and get all misty-eyed about it, let me just point out that very few people who intend to protest peacefully, show up with shields and weapons, and/or ready for confrontation and itching for a fight.

This was planned and it was planned and now continues as a loud, violent "movement" because someone is getting too close to the truth. The solution is not to get distracted, not to withdraw, but to move forward and continue to effect Justice on the criminals that now seem upset that their plans have been discovered and thwarted.

The Party of Losers

They lost an election they RIGGED, by cheating, spying on Americans, and targeting them.  They abused their power and broke the law. They are trying to cover it up by being accusative and violent and repressive.

You are probably tired of this question, but please, tell me again, WHY are the democrats, who  admittedly  RIGGED the Democrat Primary Election AGAINST Bernie Sanders, accusing the Russians of working with Trump to rig the national elections against Hillary?

The Dems shamelessly admitted to rigging the primary election.  Leaked emails clearly showed this was the case, and Donna Brazile, DNC chairwoman admitted she cheated by giving Presidential debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debate  (see report about this HERE).

When they did that, because they DECIDED by cheating, who would be Trump's challenger, the Democrats RIGGED the national election.

Now they are upset that they lost an election they RIGGED.

Who loses an election they have RIGGED so they can win?

It is beyond embarrassing to them, because once the general population that makes up the Democrat base looks beyond the talking points, and says, "wait a minute, we did what?" ... the DEMOCRAT party is OVER .

So, we now see the a "major" political party of the United States of America, caught in the criminal act of fixing a U.S. election (and then losing it) convulsing, because they were caught and exposed, and manifesting those convulsions by throwing the prolonged and violent tantrums of trying to shut down conservative free speech, and lashing out with contrived accusations of collusion by the duly elected President.  It is a classic case of psychological perplexity, confusion.  Shrinks call this "cognitive dissonance."

  "... In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental discomfort (psychological stress) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values. The occurrence of cognitive dissonance is consequence of a person's performing an action that contradicts personal beliefs, ideals, and values; and also occurs when confronted with new information that contradicts said beliefs, ideals, and values...In A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957), Leon Festinger proposed that human beings strive for internal psychological consistency in order to mentally function in the real world. That a person who experiences internal inconsistency tends to become psychologically uncomfortable, and so is motivated to reduce the cognitive dissonance: either by changing parts of the cognition, to justify the stressful behavior; or by adding new parts to the cognition that causes the psychological dissonance; and by actively avoiding social situations and contradictory information that are likely to increase the magnitude of the cognitive dissonance..." (Wikipedia)

Furthermore, we have learned in recent days that the Obama administration SPIED, not only on Trump Campaign staff, but on other Americans as well, presumably in order to maintain the "Obama-Clinton dynasty," which is a severe violation of Constitutional mandates, and the laws that govern surveillance of Americans, which violations amount to criminal acts against our nation via governmental abuse of power by targeting perceived political enemies.  See that report HERE


The Democrats ( including "the media." ) are trying to close the gap between what they want their reality to be, and what reality actually is, by attacking Trump with false accusations, and throwing violent tantrums to shut down Conservative free speech.

No, they are not upset because they lost the election and are now in "denial," and want to reconcile two conflicting "realities."

They are upset and are having a psychotic breakdown because they got caught cheating, abusing their power and targeting fellow Americans, and are now attempting to cover that up by staging violent protests and attacking the President, and those that legally elected him to that office.


They have been caught committing criminal acts, and are lashing out to avoid accountability for it.  They exhibit the violent convulsions of a condemned criminal enroute to receive his punishment.

They have been caught and their transgressions exposed.

Why have the perpetrators not been arrested, indicted, tried, and punished?

SCARY BARRY ...

These so called "leaks" that are giving Trump so much trouble, are much more than just "leaks."  They are attacks upon the Trump administration by specific people, but they are also a "cover-up."

It may be that the Obama administration, believing that they did not have to erase or cover their tracks for whatever misdeeds or mistakes they may have perpetrated that would be incriminating to them, after the election, because they believed they would be succeeded by Hillary Clinton, after she defeated Donald Trump, left too much available for scrutiny, when the election did not go their way.

Emerging and established events have pointed to the possibility that the Obama administration did not have the opportunity in time and action they deemed sufficient to delete or eradicate acts or items that constituted political and legal and/or moral transgressions.

It appears that their solution was to sabotage, obfuscate and obscure, detract and distract, and to attack the character, ability and integrity of the new administration's appointees and employees.

Their misdeeds, judging from the magnitude of the attacks upon the Trump administration, including paid demonstrators, protesters, rioters; media and pundit propaganda perpetrators, and complicit political actors threatening government action for alleged wrongdoings, must, due to the scope of the sabotage, obfuscation, obscuring, detraction and distraction, be a massive attempt to cover-up an equally or greater quantity of transgression(s) by the Obama administration.

The question(s) now should be, "What are we missing," and/or "What are they attempting to cover-up?"  The question now is "will the Trump administration follow through with a decisive challenge to the attack upon its personnel and endeavors, should the premise of a massive cover-up be true."

Another question is, "will Trump supporters, i.e., those voters that elected him, and allies that support him, provide sufficient support to aid his administration to best his opponents once and for all?"

Where do you stand, and what will you do, as this development in history unfolds before you?

Millions for Iran In Exchange for Hostages? Baloney!

You know the story.  A hefty dose of millions has been given to Iran.  The story goes that the money was transported "secretly" in foreign denominations as "ransom" money in exchange for the release of hostages.  That's the big "controversy."  (You can read about THAT Here if you don't already know about it.)

Well if it's such a big secret, how do we know about it?

Ah.  Well, you know about it because someone on the "inside" leaked it to a reporter and now you have the info on this.

I am here to tell you, that is not how it went down.

My take is this:

The Obamistas, including Hillary, Kerry, and all the Bozo's on their bus saw a pile of money just sitting there, and an Iranian regime salivating over it, willing to do just about anything for it, so they can finance their "state-sponsored" terrorism.

So the Obamistas tell the Iranian ghouls:  "Hey, we can get that money released for you ... for a price.  How can we pull this off, you ask?  We deliver it to you in CASH.  And that's how you pay Obama and Company.  We make this "tiny" commission ($), and you get your money to finance Hamas and all your little terrorist friends around the globe.  While the media and pundits argue about whether it was an exchange for hostages, we bank the cash, and no one will be the wiser."

Please get with it.  These are the same people that have rigged elections and have been fleecing the American people, since just after the American Civil War.

"Millions for Iran" in exchange for hostages?

Baloney.

Alright, then, if it's not stupidity, then what is it?

We know from recent developments that the Hillary Server Scandal has exploded beyond just mere speculation about whether any classified information has been compromised.

As a recap, here is the gist of the latest gory details as reported by Catherine Herridge @ Fox News.

"...Highly classified Hillary Clinton emails that the intelligence community and State Department recently deemed too damaging to national security to release contain 'operational intelligence' – and their presence on the unsecure, personal email system jeopardized 'sources, methods and lives,' ...  the U.S. government official’s description provides confirmation that the emails contained closely held government secrets. “Operational intelligence” can be real-time information about intelligence collection, sources and the movement of assets ... The official emphasized that the 'TOP SECRET' documents were sent over an extended period of time -- from shortly after the server's 2009 installation until early 2013 when Clinton stepped down as secretary of state ..."

Herridge quotes in her report  House intelligence committee member,  Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kansas), asserting that Hillary Clinton, a "Yale-trained lawyer had to know what she was dealing with."

"... 'There is no way that someone, a senior government official who has been handling classified information for a good chunk of their adult life, could not have known that this information ought to be classified, whether it was marked or not,' he said. 'Anyone with the capacity to read and an understanding of American national security, an 8th grade reading level or above, would understand that the release of this information or the potential breach of a non-secure system presented risk to American national security ' ... Pompeo also suggested the military and intelligence communities have had to change operations, because the Clinton server could have been compromised by a third party ... 'Anytime our national security team determines that there's a potential breach, that is information that might potentially have fallen into the hands of the Iranians, or the Russians, or the Chinese, or just hackers, that they begin to operate in a manner that assumes that information has in fact gotten out,' Pompeo said ..."

It appears that Pompeo might be voicing what many must be thinking and assuming, and that is:  Nobody is that stupid or ignorant as to completely endanger national security and many of the lives that are dependent on that information remaining secure.

Alright, then, if it's not stupidity, then what is it?

It is at the very least, not just lying, but massively lying.  It is also, not just fraud, but massive fraud.  It is also not simply a disregard for the trust and the law and security she has sworn to uphold, but also the severe breach of security which may have already compromised information and lives of agents, sources, and the families of those who depended on Clinton maintaining the proper security.

What now?

Clinton now must face those who are charged with effecting Justice:  The FBI, the Justice Department, the American people, and those victims of her server breaches of security.  She must also answer to those who believed in her politically, and to those against whom she perpetrated fraud by taking their money, their effort, their time and their trust in her as a political candidate.  She must also answer to those with which she has exchanged political favors, who have backed her financially and otherwise.

Will she be brought to Justice?

The White House has already announced that it will withhold emails between the President and his Secretary of State, Clinton, from public view.

New York Times' Michael D. Shear and Michael S. Schmidt wrote at the end of last October that Obama was doing just that.

"...The White House will try to block the release of a handful of emails between President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, citing longstanding precedent invoked by presidents of both parties to keep presidential communications confidential, officials said Friday ... White House officials said Friday that their refusal to release the emails between the two officials is not based on their content, but rather is intended to defend the principle that presidents must be free to receive advice from their top aides without fear that the conversations will be made public during their time in office. They noted the emails between Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton will eventually become public many years after the Obama presidency ends, under the terms of federal records laws..."

The White House is not invoking Executive Privilege, but is shielding the emails nevertheless.

"...by refusing to release the emails, Mr. Obama is following a well-worn precedent that he and his predecessors have established. Mr. Obama has repeatedly resisted efforts by Congress to turn over the president’s private communications, which by law are exempt from Freedom of Information laws that are often used to pry information out of other parts of an administration..."

However, how will we know which emails actually fall under the special privilege purview, if we cannot see them?  How can one know if an email or a thousand fall under this category if they are not available for inspection?

Another area of "interest" in this unfolding drama is the area of "the others."

What about "the others?"

We have some time since learned that Clinton has received financing and backing from many foreign entities via the Clinton Foundation, some of this financing running into the millions of dollars.

David Sirota wrote in Salon, back in late may:

"...While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton’s three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term ... The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation. That was a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period ..."

This is significant, because the State Department uses foreign governments' human rights records when reviewing arms sales to them, and according to Sirota, "Hillary Clinton’s State Department increased approvals of such deals to Clinton Foundation donors that her own agency was sharply criticizing for systematic human rights abuses."  Sirota cites the following as an example:

"... in its 2011 Human Rights Report, Clinton’s State Department slammed Algeria’s government for imposing 'restrictions on freedom of assembly and association,' tolerating 'arbitrary killing,' 'widespread corruption' and a 'lack of judicial independence.' ... That year, the Algerian government donated $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation and the next year Clinton’s State Department approved a one-year 70 percent increase in military export authorizations to the country. The jump included authorizations for almost 50,000 items classified as 'toxicological agents, including chemical agents, biological agents and associated equipment.' The State Department had not authorized the export of any of such items to Algeria the year before ... During Hillary Clinton’s 2009 Senate confirmation hearings, Republican Sen. Richard Lugar said the Clinton Foundation should stop accepting foreign government money. He warned that if it didn’t, 'foreign governments and entities may perceive the Clinton Foundation as a means to gain favor with the secretary of state.' ..."

In another report by David Sirota and Andrew Perez @ the International Business Times, we learn that yet another high priced arms sale was tainted with Clinton Foundation finger prints.

"... In the years before Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia contributed at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation, the philanthropic enterprise she has overseen with her husband, former president Bill Clinton. Just two months before the deal was finalized, Boeing -- the defense contractor that manufactures one of the fighter jets the Saudis were especially keen to acquire, the F-15 -- contributed $900,000 to the Clinton Foundation, according to a company press release.
The Saudi deal was one of dozens of arms sales approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department that placed weapons in the hands of governments that had also donated money to the Clinton family philanthropic empire, an International Business Times investigation has found.
Under Clinton's leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure -- derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) -- represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.
The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation, resulting in a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. These extra sales were part of a broad increase in American military exports that accompanied Obama’s arrival in the White House. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period..."

You can read more about that HERE...

So, let's say that as a result of some miracle Hillary Clinton is brought to Justice for these "alleged" crimes.  What about these "others."  How then will she answer for the "pay to play" or "pay for access" money she received from foreign entities?  If she cannot deliver on promises made to these "others," because she is not "The President," what then will those foreign entities do?

When she made those supposed and "alleged" promises, might we premise that she was not the only one involved in those deals?  Might we suppose that this involved White House staffers, their political allies, Cabinet Officials, Intelligence Officials, Senators and Congressmen, and even Media entities?  Because, I dare say, many of those people are also graduates of Holier Than Thou universities, and surely they know what they are doing.  Surely you do not believe THEY are stupid?

Well then, if it's not stupidity what is it?

It begins to make sense why even "establishment Republicans" are willing to sacrifice their public face and to betray their constituents so blatantly and so severely.  It would also explain why certain candidates are running for President, and why certain ones are attacking the others.  It would explain why certain candidates suddenly appear on the same side as "establishment Republicans."

What WERE they promised?

The pieces of those pies of corruption are sliced wide and long, and we might be holding the wrong end of the rope.  If this is the case, the ones left hanging from the tree of injustice, might be you and me.

A whole lot is at stake here, and there's too much running on Hillary as the next President.  She might have ensured, by involving a substantial segment of the sociopath population in Washington in her wheeling and dealing, and particularly those that "count," and therefore guaranteed that she gets off with a slap on the wrist, if that, in exchange for then assuming the Presidency.


If you have been contemplating sitting out this election, you might reconsider.  And you might take the plunge and get involved in more than just voting.

What do YOU think?



ICYMI:  Read Previous story for Background Info...

"Friend" Me HERE:  Adan Vance (Advance of Freedom / Vanguard of Freedom)

Have you had enough?  Are you fed-up?  Click HERE

HEADLINERS

The Myth of Obama's Executive Orders and the So Called "Bypass of Congress"

The Government Criminal Organizations (GCO), in this case, the Washington version, including the White House, the Congress, and the Courts, act in collusion and in conjunction, and coordinate their actions.

Any individual exceptions are few and very rare, and even then, if they are one of the "radicals" they take full advantage of waging an aggressive offense, knowing full well their measures, legislation, projects, programs will never see the light of day, much less have any chance of actually becoming a law that will then be enforced; similarly with the pretense of Constitutional protections.  So they can rant and rave and "filibuster," and have no effect, get lots of publicity, and yet do nothing, and yet because of the show, they are not held accountable.

Today the national ruse, the joke of the union, is that Obama is somehow BYPASSING Congress by issuing Executive Orders to, ostensibly, enact rules to limit gun sales and gun ownership.  The clown makes a sham of the Office of the Presidency by shedding tears for his cause, but the continuing farce, the lunacy, is the narrative that he is somehow BYPASSING Congress in issuing his executive orders.

Of course there are "guffaws" and "ahems" and choking noises from Rino's and Conservatives alike, apparently outraged at Obama's actions.

But please ask. Please look:  How can Congress be BYPASSED, when they are totally and completely in the tank for Obama?  Congress has just passed an Omnibus Bill funding anything and everything Obama wanted, "in order to not appear like they were shutting down the government."

Well, this just gets them totally off the hook, doesn't it?

Can you just hear the deals behind closed doors?  Obama says:  "Hey you fund everything I want, and I'll give you outrageous executive orders to get you off the hook."  Can you just hear one of them, possibly John Boehner, pleading with Obama, "Hey, I really get off on crocodile tears.  Could you cry for the cameras?  That would Soooooo humanize you."  And of course, can't you just hear Obama saying, "Hey, I'll put on a dress and dance on the podium if you want, but if all you want is tears, you got 'em!"

Obama cries, and "bypasses" with executive orders, and Congress expresses fake outrage, and upset, and guess what?  YOU, (WE) are cooked. Soaked.  Bilked. Shafted.

So GOOD MORNING fellow citizens.

At this point we have NO government: there is only a criminal racket occupying  Washington and that criminal enterprise controls a mega-ton of state, county, and municipal governments.

Would that we at least had Articles of Confederation, at least something that would address our basic needs as "the governed" as laid out in the Preamble to the Constitution.  We have not even that.

Instead  we have  a criminal racket that couldn't solve its way out of their own toilet if they had to. Look at the product; look at the result. It's supposed to be a "government BY THE PEOPLE ... for the people.

What are "they" actually producing? What results from their "efforts?"

The lined pockets of criminal thugs dressed in suits, sitting in plush offices paid for by the plunder of those they are supposed to serve; severe deterioration of the social fabric; bribes from foreign governments and special interests; legislation of favored status for themselves and their "benefactors" and co-conspirators.

How do we solve this?

We refuse the pretense.  WE BYPASS the facade.  We  Build a culture, a representative government from the ground up: On our block; in our neighborhood; in our town; in our district;  WE have to be willing to confront, handle and control the "government mafia" and create our own self interest right on our own sidewalk.

We start here and expand outward. We take our immediate  territory, not with tyranny, but with sanity and determination, and THEN we hold it, and then we expand from there:  One block at a time; One ranch at a time;  one neighborhood at a time; one street; one village; and once we have enough reclaimed areas that we control, THEN we create a NETWORK, and thus we build the civilization.

Do not be fooled.  There is no "civilization"  "out there."   There is something that appears to be a society,   but that is merely a chaotic entity covered with social veneer, and a very thin one at that.  Mostly there is a network of dysfunctional confusions pretending to be actual organizations, and yet, there are those who compete to control those confusions.

All that bogus, pretended society must be BYPASSED and a FOUNDATION, however basic, however small, however necessary, must be built one brick at a time to create a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure our individual and social tranquility, provide for our common defense, and secure the blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our posterity.

There will always be criminals and scoundrels, but they need not be a part of our culture nor do we need to be part of theirs.

WHAT IF?

The following is a "What If?" example to make a point about the President's pitch for gun control in the wake of the San Bernardino Terrorist attack:

Let's suppose there was a well-guarded  base in Afghanistan, which security, a handful of terrorists managed to breach, and before being caught and/or killed, managed to kill a dozen soldiers within the base.  The base Commander, knowing full well the intentions of the enemy terrorists, and communicating that to the troops within the base, then announces that he wants anyone in possession of any kind of weapon to turn in that/those weapons, and he wants base police to prevent the troops from obtaining any additional weapons.  The Commander does this as the enemy sends out a public announcement to the base, stating that they are going to launch further attacks upon the base.

The rationale the Commander advances as a justification for "gun control" is that the terrorists will not be able to shoot or kill anyone if there are no guns to be obtained from those that possess the guns on the base.

What do you think the troops within that base will perceive the state of mind of their Commander is?  On whose side do you think the troops will believe their Commander is on?

What that hypothetical Commander should do is to make sure that every one of his soldiers in that base is fully armed, and is fully trained in using the arms that they possess.  Further that Commander should ensure that any of his troops that do not have a weapon,  immediately obtain a weapon, and that they receive the best training in the use of those weapons as soon as they receive them.  The Commander should then order defensive and offensive drills, and then launch attacks on the terrorists BEFORE they are able to attack his base again, and he should annihilate the terrorists and any danger of attack by any other enemy entities, in order to ensure the security and safety of the base.

Now, apply this "hypothetical" to the San Bernardino terrorist attack and the actions of the President in its aftermath.

I should point out that we are into the second week, since our homeland was attacked.  It was an act of WAR against our country.  DAYS after the mass murder it was already too late.  Hell should have been unleashed immediately upon the headquarters of the cowards in Syria and Iraq that congratulated the terrorists for their actions in San Bernardino.  Their headquarters in Raqqah should have already been wiped out, and a systematic annihilation of anything left of that regime should have by now been systematically underway.

Instead  those that were thrust into cowardice and hand-wringing by the attack, including those in the media, are targeting our own people in this country, are advocating for the surrender of our arms, demonizing those who dare to speak against the enemy, rabidly criticizing anyone who wants to take aggressive measures to protect our borders and our national entry points, and in the case of our "Attorney General," she has threatened to violate our first amendment rights, outright stating that we now have no freedom of speech, unless she deems it so, and that we cannot write or say anything against anyone of a particular religion, and that if anyone does, they will be prosecuted for "hate speech."

Pardon me, but where exactly would the Attorney General incarcerate thousands upon thousands of Black Muslims, who rant and rave with "hate speech" against "White Devils?"  Would she immediately arrest Louis Farrakhan and his followers?  Or was she favoring one religion over another, "just because" she is the Attorney General.

To sum this up: The President should have launched an all out attack against our terrorist enemies.  He should have issued an executive order for the applicable agencies to issue weapons  immediately to any Americans who are able to use them, and made training available to them.  The applicable agencies should then be organizing community security events to teach people what to look for to detect terrorism and terrorist attacks.

In other words, he should be taking any and all actions necessary to make safe our nation and its borders.

Instead, what do we have?

Do Not Sip Coffee While Reading This: DO POLITICIANS LIE?

HOUSTON, WE HAVE A PROBLEM

COVER-UP EVEN WORSE THAN THE CRIME: "TRUTH" MOVIE ABOUT CBS LIES IS NOTHING MORE THAN A COVER-UP TRY TO SAVE PROPAGANDA MILL

SWEAT IS COLOR-BLIND

THE NAUSEATING BULL THESE ELITES SPOUT IS SURPASSED IN STUPIDITY ONLY BY THE PUTRID STENCH OF THEIR ILLOGIC

WELL, HELLO! YOU EXPECTED FAIRNESS, HONESTY, AND DEBATES WITHOUT CORRUPTION?

EX-CIA CHIEF SAYS THEY NEVER TOLD CLINTON THAT VIDEO WAS CAUSE OF ATTACK

ISIS CLAIMS ANOTHER MASS MURDER / SHOT DOWN RUSSIAN AIRLINER

Advance of Freedom

NOW